|
|
 |
B A B Y L O N
In recent years the number of church drop-outs has been increasing.
Young people especially have become more dissatisfied with
established Christian institutions. Youth movements, home prayer
groups and underground churches have been increasing rapidly,
while attendance at formal worship services has dropped off.
Many revolutionary voices have been raised. The cry, "Come out of
Babylon!" has been heard again and again. Any by Babylon, the
voices generally mean the institutional, organized churches. Down
through the centuries the voices of reformation have repeatedly
tagged the existing order of things with this label. The Reformers in
the days of Luther and Calvin saw the Roman church as "Babylon"
and the "Come-outers" of every generation since have seen the
groups they left as Babylon.
Today, some who emphasize freedom and simplicity say any
organized, institutionalized church is part of Babylon, while others
who place a strong emphasis on the unity of the body point more to
all divisions of the church—even down to the independent home
meetings—as representing Babylon. Either of these groups would
tend to equate denominations with Babylon, and urge all Christians
to come out.
Is this right? If it is, then sincere Christians in denominations had
better get out before the judgment falls, and those outside should
even more zealously urge this action upon their brethren. But if this
view is not right, then what is Babylon? For there is something
meant by God when He says, Come out of her my people." Could it
be that both denominational and un- (or anti-) denominational
Christians are missing the real point?
The history of all Christians who have dropped out of the existing
church structure to begin a new thing in their day shows one of two
things: either they disintegrated or in their success they formed
another institution. Certainly Luther and Calvin did so, although in
their case they apparently did so deliberately. Others, such as John
Darby and the "Plymouth" Brethren, for all their strong willed
intention not to do so, only formed another denomination. Of course,
many in that group even today will deny this, but how are they
different? Merely saying we are not a denomination (or division)
does not make it true! The fact remains that all the marks of a sect
or denomination are obvious.
The early Pentecostal movement was universal and truly catholic,
including any and all. But it quickly became as sectarian,
institutionalized and divisive—if not more so—than the rest of
Christendom. It seems no matter what the intentions are of those
who "come out of Babylon", they themselves wind up being Babylon
for the next generation of come-outers!
As the Spirit of God moved in many hearts with a longing for
manifest Christian unity, many groups have sprung up claiming to be
or to represent the true Church, separate from all division. Their
ground of meeting is simply unity in the Body of Christ. Such groups
range from non-denominational churches, virtually indistinguishable
from any denominational evangelical congregation, to little, fiercely
independent, home meetings.
Some of these refer to the historic captivity of the Jews in Babylon,
pointing our that God's call to His people then was to come out and
return to Jerusalem. They say God had only one place where Jews
were to worship, and that was Jerusalem. There were many
synagogues built in captivity but only one temple in Jerusalem. To
remain in Babylon when God was calling to return was an act of
divisiveness. Likewise today, they say, where Christians are
scattered among the various denomination, God is calling us to unity,
to come out of the divisions—which are Babylon—and return to the
ground of unity.
On the surface, this is a powerful argument. It seems true to the
Scriptural type. But it depends on one assumption: that Babylon
represents divisions. If this can be proved, the argument stands.
We will return to his point in a moment.
These views of coming out of Babylon is that they tend to created
spiritual pride in those who hold them. "WE" have come out; "you"
have not. "We" have seen the light; "you" have not. "We" have
come out and will be blessed; "others" will be cursed or fall into
limbo.
Even the move toward unity tends to create the very division it
vocally deplores. "We" are on the ground of unity; "you" are not.
"We" have the truth; come and join us. There is a pronounced
awareness that some are "in" and some are "out".
Every attempted move to recover the true church, the New
Testament church, seems to have ended in splintering, sectarian
division. Somehow no one seems to have found the right
combination, but there is always someone who thinks that he has at
last uncovered the key and so makes another attempt, only to fail
again.
If every attempt to follow the divine injunction to come out of
Babylon results in only more confusion and division, we must be
misunderstanding what it is we are to come out of; we must be
misunderstanding Babylon. The conclusion is inescapable, so I
suggest that we re-open the question. Just what is Babylon?
The origins of Babylon date back to the eleventh chapter of Genesis
and the tower of Babel. "Babe" means confusion, or division, and so
some find further ground here for identifying Babylon with division.
A closer look at the text however, tells a different story.
1. "The whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
2. "And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a
plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
3. And they said one to another. Go to, let us make brick, and burn them
thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime hand they for mortar.
4. And they said, Let us build us a city and a tower whose tope may reach
unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad
upon the face of the whole earth.
5. And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower which the children
of men builded.
6. And the Lord said, Behold, the people are one and they have all one
language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained (or
withheld) from them, which they have imagined to do.
7. Let us go down and there confound their language, and that they may no
understand one another's speech.
8. So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the
earth: and they left off to build the city.
9. Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did confound
the language of the earth; and from thence did the Lord scatter them
abroad upon the face of all the earth."
Note verses 1 and 5. All the people of the earth had one language
and one speech. They gathered together in the land of Shinar. God
Himself said, "The people are one"! And they began to build a tower
"unto heaven". There was a unity there more profound and complete
than any unity mankind since has ever known.
Everybody had one language with one pronunciation. All linguistic
research tends to bear out this fact that once only one language
existed on earth, enabling mankind in the flesh to be perfectly
united.
Man desired to build a tower whose primary purpose (vs.4) was to
preserve this unity. What that tower was is debatable. Some infer
from the Hebrew text translated "whose top…unto heaven" that it
was the culmination of astrological knowledge of the ancients. The
similarity of the signs of the Zodiac the world over, adds support to
this theory. Whatever the tower was, it surely demonstrates the
advanced degree of civilization at that time, for it contained bricks
backed in ovens cemented together with asphalt ("slime"). It clearly
dealt with some kind of knowledge, for in order to destroy it God
destroyed communication; he confused languages so men could no
longer communicate. The tower must have been a thing of titanic
importance, for God Himself said, "This they begin to do" (or "This is
only the beginning"): and now nothing will be withheld from them,
which they have imagined to do." (vs.6).
If man had built the tower, everything he could imagine would have
been his! Nothing would be withheld! Without God, in the power of
the flesh, operating solely by the knowledge of good and the evil,
mankind would have unlocked all the secrets of nature, conquered
the earth and achieved the perfect society. Utopia would have
arrived. This tower was to be the consummation of the Tree of
knowledge of good and evil, the highest accomplishment of carnal
man. If men reached this stage, they would have become almost, if
not completely, unredeemable if God had so allowed.
In His mercy God did not let it happen. He stepped down, confused
their language so they could not understand each other, and
scattered them over the earth. Acts 17:26 tells us he sets the
boundaries of the nations so that men cannot join together.
National boundaries and thousands of languages still stand as the
two most formidable obstacles to world unity. It is not without
significance that, despite the many fantastic accomplishments of
modern computers, computer language translation has been almost
completely abandoned as virtually an impossible task.
Much damage has come as a result of confusion, misunderstanding of
speech and national differences. Wars result almost entirely from
these roots. Man tends to regard these barriers to unity as a great
evil—yet it was God who ordained them! Get that: God ordained the
confusion. God scattered the people. God destroyed the unity.
To sum up then: the city of Babel is a symbol of fleshly unity, man's
attempts to be one apart from the Spirit of God. Such attempts at
unity God destroys. The confusion which followed was not Babel; it
was the result of God's destruction of Babel. The story of the tower
of Babel is a story of God's destruction of carnal unity.
Is this picture of Babylon as representing a false unity borne out by
the rest of Scripture? Assuredly yes! In the first chapter of Daniel
we see how Babylon was attempting to unite the earth under one
great empire. Defeated nations were razed and their cities leveled.
The intelligent youths of these nations were re-named with
Babylonian names, taught Babylonian science and Babylonian
language, and given Babylonian food. It was history's first world
empire, attempting history's most ambitious brainwashing project,
with an aim to produce a united earth by institutionalized force.
Right down to the book of Revelation we see Babylon as a unifying,
building power attempting to set up the kingdom of man. Babylon is
the utter antitheses of division! And throughout history God has
continually stepped in, time and time again, to smash, scatter and
destroy a whole succession of Babylon's. In the end, however,
prophecy tells us political Babylon will apparently succeed in uniting
the earth under antichrist, but "the stone cut without hands" (Christ
in his many-membered body) will pulverize the "image of a man" and
will break them with a rod of iron.
Simply this. As startling as it may seem,
denomi-nations in a very important sense are ordained of God!
What? Yes, denominational confusion and division, the scattering of
Christians over the face of the earth, the theological confusion and
contradiction of terminology and language, is all a direct result of
God's will! He is not opposed to denominations: He caused them.
Wait! Don't quit reading here or you'll miss the main point.
Denominational division is the result of God's merciful stepping in to
break up a false Christian unity. It is God's way to keep us from
going too far in the wrong direction.
From the end of the First Century, Christians began to try to "protect
and preserve the unity of the Body" by fleshly, worldly means:
institutions, creeds, laws and official leaders or priests. That was the
beginning of religious Babylon. Eventually it got so bad that God
simply had to break it up. The result was divisions and
denominations.
Every time man takes it upon himself to build, "the true church", God
breaks it up! That's why every attempt has, and always will, end in
failure. God is opposed to it. That isn't His way. It is simply not in
the power of man to build the Church: it is not man's responsibility.
Man is not capable of doing the job, and the minute we think we are,
we begin to exercise our flesh. We get trapped in a kind of corporate
salvation-by-works.
Even the best "New Testament Church" can be just another Babel to
God, more dangerous than most because it looks more like the real
thing. So God breaks it up even quicker. Haven't you noticed that?
The more "right" we are, the faster the failure, the more drastic the
division.
Man is not supposed to build the ecclesia. Jesus said, "I will build
my church" (Gk."ecclesia"). The very word "church" is so tainted
with man's carnal efforts that I prefer to use the transliteration of
the Greek, "ecclesia", to help us toward new and fresh thought.
There-fore, from now on I will use the term "church" to indicate
what man builds and the word "ecclesia" for reference to what Jesus
Christ has built.
When God sends division, what does He divide? He divides the
churches. The ecclesia is never, has never, and will never be divided.
If Jesus Christ, God's only begotten Son, prayed that we all may be
one, I believe God answered and still is answering. If we for one
moment admit that division among the churches represents real
division in the ecclesia, we are saying that millions of Christians have
been left out of Jesus' prayer.
If the ecclesia (not just the churches) is truly divided today and I
died tomorrow, then Jesus should have prayed—for my sake—that all
except myself may be one. And He should likewise have excepted all
who have died in ages gone by.
But He prayed for all "that they all my be one". God hears His Son.
If the Father does not answer the prayer of Jesus, we may as well
give up! No, all are one; the ecclesia is not divided.
Division Exists in the Flesh
Division exists only in the flesh. Come out of the flesh, and for you
the divisions cease to exist. This has been the great discovery (but
little understood) in the charismatic renewal. Enter into real
spiritual experience and denominational barriers seem to melt. The
Holy Spirit has been able to break down that great wall of partition
between Protestant and Catholic. Truly, in experience, thousands
have found that "in one Spirit" we are all baptized "into one body"
(1Cor.12:13).
So, coming out of Babylon does not necessarily mean leaving
institutional Christianity. It does not necessarily mean leaving
divisions. It means leaving every attempt to build "the true church."
It means ceasing from every effort to do something that God has
already done. It is essentially an inner, spiritual move, a heart
move.
Yes, denominations are in the will of God, but they are not even part
of the ecclesia. We cannot leave a denomination to join the ecclesia.
We don't have to leave, for we are already in the ecclesia by the fact
of new birth. To the degree we live our lives for a denomination or
church, to that degree we are in Babylon. But it is quite possible that
we could be members of a denomination and yet be living for the
ecclesia. Our hearts would simply refuse to be limited by a
denominational structure, but would reach out and include all who
are born of the Spirit.
So you don't feel that God wants you to leave your denomination?
I'll buy that! I can believe it. Many in the denominations are
probably more free of the spirit of Babylon than some of those
shouting loudest about coming out! But beware, my brother. Don't
confuse that "church" you belong to with the ecclesia of Jesus Christ!
Others of you feel you cannot be bound or limited by human
institutions any long, you have to break free? I'll buy that! That's
where I find myself. But beware, my brother. Don't confuse this
physical departure with a true departure of your heart. Have you
ever witnessed an encounter between a denominational Christian
(Mr. In) and one who has "come out" (Mr. Out)? The conversation
eventually comes to this:
Mr. In: What church or denomination do you belong to?
Mr. Out: I belong to none.
Mr. In: That sounds awfully independent to me. Do you think you're
superior or something?
Instead of "I belong to none", Mr. Out could have more wisely
answered, "I belong to all of them". It expresses the spirit of Paul
when he said, "All are yours", and "You are all members, each one of
the other." True., I don't belong to any denominational organization,
but I do belong to my brothers and sister who are in them! And they
belong to me, regardless of whether or not they realize it.
That's who Paul argued with the Corinthians. They were saying, "we
are of Paul, we are of Apollo, we are of Cephas, we are of Christ".
They were saying they were divided. Paul replied, "You cannot be
divided! Is Christ divided? If you say you are divided, you are being
carnal, behaving like ordinary men. You are looking on things with
the eyes of the flesh. All of these leaders belong to you all, and
together you all belong to Christ." (1Cor.1:12,13; 2:3,21-23).
"Is Christ divided?" If we can admit to a divided Christ, then and
only then can we admit to a divided Body of Christ. To admit to the
division of the Body is to admit to the division of the Head! Let go of
that fleshly viewpoint! See and confess that there is one Lord, and
one Body.
I say again, it is not the ecclesia which is divided; it is the human
additions and mutations. I am no longer striving for Christian unity.
I am celebrating it. Why should I strive for something already
accomplished? "Henceforth know we no man after the flesh. " I
simply refuse to see that any brother is divided from me. I confess
the fact of our unity. He may think he is separated from me, but I
will never believe that lie; I will never look on the fleshly
separations; I will look on the unifying life of God we both share.
Maybe you are thinking as you read this, "I agree that in spirit we
are all one Body, and that this must be emphasized; but what about
the expression or manifestation of that unity? How can this unity be
made visible and practical? Don't we need to leave all divisions
behind and come together in a united testimony of oneness?
Well, brother, first of all, if you do that you are in danger of repeating
the mistakes of others, merely starting another tower with will end
in confusion. You will be confessing your unity with all the people
who share your vision, but what about all the ones you leave behind?
You're separated from them. What then?, you say, "Do you believe
just in some ethereal, invisible church?"
No, I intensely believe the ecclesia must be visible and that the
oneness of the Body of Christ must be seen. Once again, however,
we are clouded with an age old misunderstanding. That
misunderstanding relates to how the ecclesia is to be made visible.
When I say, "one church", what do we immediately think of? One
institution, one type of meeting, on type of church order, one set of
beliefs. We think of some kind of human body which ties us together
much like the Masonic order. And this is exactly what the ecclesia is
not.
Jesus declared that we would be seen and known as His disciples.
He said, "By this will all men know that ye are my disciples, (my
company of called-out ones, my ecclesia), if ye have love one to
another" (Jn.13:35). In Acts the unbelievers said, "Behold how they
love one another." They noticed this: "These men have been with
Jesus." Paul declared in 1 Corinthians that if an unbeliever walked
into the Christian meeting he would confess, "God is in your midst."
John, in his first epistle said, "These things declare we unto you that
ye may also have fellowship with the Father and with His Son, Jesus
Christ."
The ecclesia is made visible and known by two things: the fellowship
of love to one another and the fellowship of the present communion
with God. Not by meetings, organization, or doctrinal creeds, but by
the fellowship of love. When I love God and my brother, and express
that love in action, that is the ecclesia made visible. There is a unity
and communion which is unearthly and inimitable. We may be of
different races, different social levels, different educational
backgrounds, and different cultures—even different doctrinal
beliefs—but in a living way we are manifestly united. That's the
ecclesia.
It can happen within denominations, without them, or across
denominational barriers. The ecclesia is a happening! It has utterly
no relationship to "churches". It is like the air; regardless of where
you are, it is available. The Spirit is like the wind, and He it is who
unites the ecclesia.
Or when two or three believers get together for fellowship with
Jesus, and He meets with them, that's the ecclesia. An unbeliever,
seeing this, senses something real. He senses Someone who is
present. That's the ecclesia. Don't you See. We could build a huge
auditorium and gather every Christian in the world, we could all elect
the same leaders and recite the same creed, participate in the same
kind of worship and what would we have? It would be impressive,
but not much more impressive than world Communism today. They
have that kind of unity.
The ecclesia is not just the sum total of all believers. It involves the
inter-action of those believers through which and by means of which
God expresses His life to the world., just as a man expresses his life
through the inter-acting members of his body.
In 1 John 4:12, we read, "No man hath seen God at anytime. If we
love one another, God dwells in us, and His love is perfected in us."
In other words, God is seen in our love, and John always
understands love as in action ("in deed and in truth").
The unity and oneness we have is visible only in our loving
fellowship with each other and with God. Institutions of any sort,
small or large, are not necessary to this fellowship—but neither do
they prevent our enjoying it! I personally believe that as more
Christians see the ecclesia, realize that "it is finished", and relax and
enjoy it, the institutions will, for the most part, simply wither away
because they will have lost their significance. I am not however,
going to waste my time fighting a straw man, trying to make it
happen. That is the technique of Babylon. I can enjoy the ecclesia
now irregardless, of my "religious" surroundings.
Oh, hallelujah! The reality of the ecclesia is changeless and
unchangeable, and we can tap into it at will, by faith and enjoy the
great throbbing, pulsing life of a universal Body. We can touch any
Christian or group and touch them as one with them, perfectly and
totally, in spirit! We can, as regards the ecclesia, simply cease from
our labours and enter into His rest.
As for the practical questions of "Where do we fellowship?" and
"What form shall our fellowship take?", we can see from the
preceding that the answers are almost irrelevant to a true expression
of the ecclesia. Our true worship is "in spirit and in truth", not "in a
certain place with certain forms."
That is not to say the questions are unimportant, only that they have
no pat answers. For myself, I will always seek the place or group
where I feel most freedom is given for the practice and affirmation of
the unity and fullness of the Body of Christ in love. But the very
nature of the ecclesia means that I cannot ever be limited to any
group no matter how perfectly it seems to accord with the New
Testament pattern, for there is no group that includes all of this
tremendous ecclesia to which alone I ultimately belong.
In the end, it comes down to our primary motivation. Are we giving
our selves to building a human institution which includes only a
portion of the Body of Christ, or are we first of all concerned with the
edification in love of the whole Body? Are we furthering a thing,
an"it", a tower of Babel., or are we developing a fellowship in spirit?
Are we building a synagogue in which men meet, or the temple in
which God dwells? To build synagogues is to live in Babylon, but to
build the Temple..is to truly obey God when He says, "Come out of
her my people."
Author unknown
|
|
|
|